I’ve been a ‘PhD student’ for quite a while now. It’s one of those things that I’ve always meant to finish but building stuff has always gotten in the way. I’ve also just gotten tired of the lunacy of academic requirements. I’ve written and received a number of grants. However, that doesn’t count for my PhD. I talked to one of my professors and he informed me that I would need to follow the requirements of the class. I found it amusing that in order to get a PhD I needed to pretend to get a grant rather than actually get a grant.
To be fair if I pushed the issue or if I started the ‘class’ before I wrote another grant I’m sure that I would get credit. However, I think that this experience highlights part of academia that is broken and has serious implications for OER adoption. Too often our focus is on the requirements and the certification rather than the experience and outcome. I’ve been in a many classes where a student would ask, “but how will I use this in real life?” All too often the response from the instructor is a curt response – ‘because I say so’, ‘because the state requires it’, ‘for the sake of learning’, ‘to pass the test’ etc. This immediately alienates students who are seeking context and real world application for the information. I think this is a trait common amongst human beings. When presented with so much information we discard the bits we don’t find useful (Calculus) for the information we find immediately applicable (how to get a date for the dance).
The world of OER has an interesting opportunity to approach the ‘how will I use this’ question in a novel way. Currently many of the individual learners are consuming OER because it does answer some real world problem. That problem might simply be curiosity but the motivation for consuming the course comes from the student rather than from the potential for credentials. No other scenario is available to the student of OER. Institutions offering the material (kindly) provide it, but the student is left without an opportunity to receive a degree. Most employers determine eligibility based on whether the individual has been stamped by a respectable organization. This leaves a chasm between consumption of OER and the professional advancement of the student. Due to the rising cost of higher education I believe that over the next decade or so educational opportunities will branch out from large institutions. Those who can afford to attend a university will still do so, but that still leaves a large population of individuals unable to dedicate 4 years and thousands of dollars. That group can be served by the OER community.
Our vision is authentic, sustainable, open learning. Along the way I hope we can find a way to provide the credentials users require to succeed, but provide them with authentic learning experiences. OER glue aims to use the web, the real parts, WordPress, Drupal, Facebook, Google Docs, etc to enhance OER materials. I’d like to think that a user pursuing education via this technology won’t ever have to ask ‘how will I use this’, but instead will find themselves using the technologies immediately to build an online reputation or even start the next big thing. I know that I would rather find myself in WordPress than in Blackboard any day. We use Google Docs everyday. Students using OER Glue will as well. We’ll monitor student success as we go and make adjustments to improve the learner experience. Oh and in case you are worried that I lack the academic credentials. Don’t lose any sleep. Joel has a PhD.